Beauty Brand Shiseido Ends Animal Testing

By  |  1 Comment
Beauty Brand Shiseido Ends Animal Testing
Animal testing on rabbit

Photo via flickr

Japanese makeup company Shiseido has banned animal testing for its products and vows to only test on animals on the off chance that an ingredient is deemed unsafe, according to Women’s Wear Daily (WWD).

This comes in light of last month’s decision by the European Coalition to end animal experimentation by banning the use of animals in cosmetics testing in all European Union countries. The new rule, which goes into effect on March 11, applies to both drugstore and high-end products and prohibits testing on final products and ingredients. Products that have animal testing, either in Europe or abroad, will not be allowed to be sold in the European market.

WWD shares that while Israel enforced a similar ban in January 2013, China mandates the opposite: Cosmetics products sold in the country must undergo animal testing in order to be sold in the Chinese market, ergo, forcing many otherwise cruelty-free brands to continue animal testing.

But if you think Shiseido is letting go of the Chinese market with this ban, think again! The cosmetics company has a loophole in their ban that states that it will continue testing in those countries where animal testing is legally mandated.

“Our business partners that supply material to us will not rely on animal testing, while we will no longer outsource such testing to outside labs,” a Shiseido spokesman said, according to The Global Post.

So far, the United States has yet to impose a ban on animal testing. But according to the Humane Society‘s FAQ on animal testing in the US:

Although they are not required by law, several tests are commonly performed by exposing mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and other animals to cosmetics ingredients. This can include:

  • skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed onto the shaved skin or dripped into the eyes of restrained rabbits without any pain relief
  • repeated force-feeding studies lasting weeks or months to look for signs of general illness or specific health hazards such as cancer or birth defects
  • widely condemned “lethal dose” tests, in which animals are forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to determine the dose that causes death.

At the end of a test the animals are killed, normally by asphyxiation, neck-breaking or decapitation. Pain relief is not provided. In the United States, a large percentage of the animals used in such testing (such as laboratory-bred rats and mice) are not counted in official statistics and receive no protection under the Animal Welfare Act.

 

Susmita is a freelance writer and editor in the Greater New York City area with her own blog on natural beauty (Cherry Stained Lips). In her spare time, Susmita enjoys cooking, traveling, dappling in photography, art history and interior design, and moonlighting as a therapist for her loved ones.

  • Anne

    It’s extremely hypocritical of Shiseido having its feet in both avenues of sale when one of them is hell bent on animal cruelty. Once again profits at all costs enters the equation in the corporate market . . . . The get out clause ie “to only test on animals on the off chance that an ingredient is deemed unsafe” is a cop out of not truly being caring to animals which I find repugnant . . . ” two faced or what !!!!!! ” if Shiseido deems an ingredient unsafe, makes you wonder what value they placed on “being safe” before they had to comply with new European Laws on animal cruelty . . . . . Again a multi national conglomerate does exactly what it pleases regardless of ethics in the pursuit of profits . . . . . SICK SICK SICK . . . .